An In Vitro Beef

Featured Blogger / by Jennifer Jacquet /

Even if meat isn’t murder, that doesn’t mean it’s good for you.

A meat-eater driving a Prius contributes more to climate change than a vegan driving a Hummer. By now, it is broadly understood that eating less meat would relieve a bit of pressure on our sullied atmosphere by lightening the methane load (by roughly 10 kilowatt hours per day—more than double what you’d save by changing lights to fluorescents—if you eat vegetarian six days a week, according to physicist David MacKay at Cambridge University).

But eating less meat would require sacrifice. It would also require applying the brakes to the increased demand for meat in China, India, and the other developing countries naïvely salivating for crappy (and lethal) American eating habits. Eating less meat might even require regulation.

The marketplace, in its infinite wisdom, would prefer not to alter American meat-eating ways. It is more comfortable keeping and exporting our lifestyle and, on a good day, has hopes of improving its efficiency.

Enter Frankenmeat, or to be politically correct, in-vitro meat, which translates to a bioengineered ground round fresh from the petri dish. Certainly in-vitro meat isn’t any freakier than factory farming, and one can imagine deli customers would prefer the tour of laboratories to the one of slaughterhouses. Laboratory-made meats might also be made with far less energy, which is certainly a plus.

But in-vitro meat does nothing to address the deeper, systemic issues of food production—we should be getting more intimate with our food by growing gardens, eating locally, and getting healthy. The Frankenmeat solution is one-dimensional. It addresses a symptom, but not the problem: We eat too much meat.

Boring, you say.

“Being vegetarian isn’t cool anymore,” a friend recently put it. “I can name so many people who were vegetarian for five years and now eat bacon four times a day.”

As vegetarianism has gained a foothold in urban eateries and elitist supermarkets, a predictable anti-vegetarian backlash has ensued. The hostility toward vegetarianism challenges resounding advice from doctors, nutritionists, not to mention food guru Michael Pollan.

More fashionable, perhaps, is a laboratory-made meat. It might relieve the guilt of the scientifically minded and environmentally aware, but beyond that, its advantages are as-yet unclear: because let’s face it, a centralized, high-tech model of food production is not likely to solve wholesale hunger issues, nor is it likely to appeal to the “down home cookin’” contingent. In-vitro meat won’t cure obesity. And it won’t change people’s nutritional needs. Eating plants is not just better for the environment. It is, quite simply, better for you.

Originally published August 31, 2009

Tags energy food public perception

Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM